Expositions of Holy Scripture | Page 5

Alexander Maclaren
little words 'to be'
are inserted here as a supplement. They may be correct enough, but they are open to the
possibility of misunderstanding, as if the saintship, to which all Christian people are
'called' was something future, and not realised at the moment. Now, in the context, the
Apostle employs the same form of expression with regard to himself in a clause which
illuminates the meaning of my text. 'Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ' says he, in the first
verse, 'called to be an Apostle' or, more correctly, 'a called Apostle.' The apostleship
coincided in time with the call, was contemporaneous with that which was its cause. And
if Paul was an Apostle since he was called, saints are saints since they are called. 'The
beloved of God' are 'the called saints.'
I need only observe, further, that the word 'called' here does not mean 'named' or
'designated' but 'summoned.' It describes not the name by which Christian men are known,
but the thing which they are invited, summoned, 'called' by God to be. It is their vocation,
not their designation. Now, then, I need not, I suppose, remind you that 'saint' and 'holy'
convey precisely the same idea: the one expressing it in a word of Teutonic, and the other
in one of classic derivation.
We notice that the true idea of this universal holiness which, _ipso facto_, belongs to all
Christian people, is consecration to God. In the old days temple, altars, sacrifices,
sacrificial vessels, persons such as priests, periods like Sabbaths and feasts, were called
'holy.' The common idea running through all these uses of the word is _belonging to
God_, and that is the root notion of the New Testament 'saint' a man who is God's. God
has claimed us for Himself when He gave us Jesus Christ. We respond to the claim when
we accept Christ. Henceforth we are not our own, but 'consecrated'--that is, 'saints.'
Now the next step is purity, which is the ordinary idea of sanctity. Purity will follow
consecration, and would not be worth much without it, even if it was possible to be
attained. Now, look what a far deeper and nobler idea of the service and conditions of
moral goodness this derivation of it from surrender to God gives, than does a
God-ignoring morality which talks and talks about acts and dispositions, and never goes
down to the root of the whole matter; and how much nobler it is than a shallow religion
which in like manner is ever straining after acts of righteousness, and forgets that in order
to be right there must be prior surrender to God. Get a man to yield himself up to God
and no fear about the righteousness. Virtue, goodness, purity, righteousness, all these
synonyms express very noble things; but deep down below them all lies the New
Testament idea of holiness, consecration of myself to God, which is the parent of them
all.
And then the next thing to remind you of is that this consecration is to be applied all
through a man's nature. Yielding yourselves to God is the talismanic secret of all
righteousness, as I have said; and every part of our complex, manifold being is capable of
such consecration. I hallow my heart if its love twines round His heart. I hallow my
thoughts if I take His truth for my guide, and ever seek to be led thereby in practice and
in belief. I hallow my will when it bows and says, 'Speak, Lord! Thy servant heareth!' I
hallow my senses when I use them as from Him, with recognition of Him and for Him. In
fact, there are two ways of living in the world; and, narrow as it sounds, I venture to say
there are only two. Either God is my centre, and that is holiness; or self is my centre, in
more or less subtle forms, and that is sin.
Then the next step is that this consecration, which will issue in all purity, and will cover

the whole ground of a human life, is only possible when we have drunk in the blessed
thought 'beloved of God.' My yielding of myself to Him can only be the echo of His
giving of Himself to me. He must be the first to love. You cannot argue a man into loving
God, any more than you can hammer a rosebud open. If you do you spoil its petals. But
He can love us into loving Him, and the sunshine, falling on the closed flower, will
expand it, and it will grow by its reception of the light, and grow sunlike in its measure
and according to its nature. So a God who has only claims upon us will never be a God to
whom
Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code

 / 318
Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.