did about forty 
chapels--almost all of which have perished. 
On again visiting Milan I found in the Biblioteca Nazionale a guide- 
book to the Sacro Monte, which was not in the Biblioteca Ambrosiana, 
and of whose existence I had never heard. This guide-book was 
published in 1606 and reissued in 1610; it mentions all changes since 
1590, and even describes chapels not yet in existence, but it says 
nothing about Tabachetti's First Vision of St. Joseph chapel--the only 
one of his chapels not given as completed in the 1590 edition of Caccia. 
I had assumed too hastily that this chapel was done just after the 1590 
edition of Caccia had been published, and just before Tabachetti left for 
Crea in 1590 or 1591, whereas it now appears that it was done about 
1610, during a short visit paid by the sculptor to Varallo some twenty 
years after he had left it. 
Finding that Tabachetti returned to Varallo about 1610, I was able to 
understand two or three figures in the Ecce Homo chapel which I had 
long thought must be by Tabachetti, but had not ventured to ascribe to 
him, inasmuch as I believed him to have finally left Varallo some 
twenty years before the Ecce Homo chapel was made. I have now no 
doubt that he lent a hand to Giovanni D'Enrico with this chapel, in 
which he has happily left us his portrait signed with a V (doubtless
standing for W, a letter which the Italians have not got), cut on the hat 
before baking, and invisible from outside the chapel. 
Signor Arienta had told me there was a seal on the back of a figure in 
the Journey to Calvary chapel; on examining this I found it to show a 
W, with some kind of armorial bearings underneath. I have not been 
able to find anything like these arms, of which I give a sketch herewith: 
they have no affinity with those of the de Wespin family, unless the 
cups with crosses under them are taken as modifications of the 
three-footed caldrons which were never absent from the arms of Dinant 
copper-beaters. Tabachetti (for I shall assume that the seal was placed 
by him) perhaps sealed this figure as an afterthought in 1610, being 
unable to cut easily into the hard-baked clay, and if he could have 
Italianised the W he would probably have done so. I should say that I 
arrived at the Ecce Homo figure as a portrait of Tabachetti before I 
found the V cut upon the hat; I found the V on examining the portrait to 
see if I could find any signature. It stands next to a second portrait of 
Leonardo da Vinci by Gaudenzio Ferrari, taken into the Ecce Homo 
chapel, doubtless, on the demolition of some earlier work by 
Gaudenzio on or near the same site. I knew of this second portrait of 
Leonardo da Vinci when I published my first edition, but did not 
venture to say anything about it, as thinking that one life-sized portrait 
of a Leonardo da Vinci by a Gaudenzio Ferrari was as much of a find at 
one time as my readers would put up with. I had also known of the V 
on Tabachetti's hat, but, having no idea that his name was de Wespin, 
had not seen why this should help it to be a portrait of Tabachetti, and 
had allowed the fact to escape me. 
The figure next to Scotto in the Ecce Homo chapel is, I do not doubt, a 
portrait of Giovanni D'Enrico. This may explain the tradition at Varallo 
that Scotto is Antonio D'Enrico, which cannot be. Next to Giovanni 
D'Enrico stands the second Leonardo da Vinci, and next to Leonardo, 
as I have said, Tabachetti. In the chapel by Gaudenzio, from which they 
were taken, the figures of Leonardo and Scotto probably stood side by 
side as they still do in the Crucifixion chapel. I supposed that 
Tabachetti and D'Enrico, who must have perfectly well known who 
they were, separated them in order to get Giovanni D'Enrico nearer the
grating. It was the presumption that we had D'Enrico's portrait between 
Scotto and Leonardo, and the conviction that Tabachetti also had 
worked in the chapel, that led me to examine the very beautiful figure 
on the father side of Leonardo to see if I could find anything to confirm 
my suspicion that it was a portrait of Tabachetti himself. 
I do not think there can be much doubt that the Vecchietto is also a 
portrait of Tabachetti done some thirty years later than 1610, nor yet do 
I doubt, now I know that he returned to Varallo in 1610, that the figures 
of Herod and of Caiaphas are by him. I believe he also at this time paid 
a short    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
