the bane of large and small 
communities. Skilled labour banded itself into unions, employers 
organized to oppose them, and the result was a class conflict never 
contemplated by the founders of the Republic, repugnant to democracy 
which by its very nature depends for its existence on the elimination of 
classes. In addition to this, owing to the unprecedented immigration of 
ignorant Europeans to supply the labour demand, we acquired a sinister 
proletariat of unskilled economic slaves. Before the war labour 
discovered its strength; since the war began, especially in the allied 
nations with quasi-democratic institutions, it is aware of its power to 
exert a leverage capable of paralyzing industry for a period sufficient to 
destroy the chances of victory. The probability of the occurrence of 
such a calamity depends wholly on whether or not the workman can be 
convinced that it is his war, for he will not exert himself to perpetuate a 
social order in which he has lost faith, even though he now obtains a 
considerable increase in wages. Agreements entered into with the 
government by union leaders will not hold him if at any time he fails to 
be satisfied that the present world conflict will not result in a greater 
social justice. This fact has been demonstrated by what is known as the
"shop steward" movement in England, where the workers repudiated 
the leaders' agreements and everywhere organized local strikes. And in 
America, the unskilled workers are largely outside of the unions. 
The workman has a natural and laudable desire to share more fully in 
the good things of life. And it is coming to be recognized that material 
prosperity, up to a certain point, is the foundation of mental and 
spiritual welfare: clean and comfortable surroundings, beauty, rational 
amusements, opportunity for a rational satisfaction of, the human. 
instincts are essential to contentment and progress. The individual, of 
course, must be enlightened; and local labour unions, recognizing this, 
are spending considerable sums all over the country on schools to 
educate their members. If a workman is a profiteer, he is more to be 
excused than the business profiteer, against whom his anger is directed; 
if he is a spendthrift, prodigality is a natural consequence of rapid 
acquisition. We have been a nation of spendthrifts. 
A failure to grasp the psychology of the worker involves disastrous 
consequences. A discussion as to whether or not his attitude is 
unpatriotic and selfish is futile. No more profound mistake could be 
made than to attribute to any element of the population motives wholly 
base. Human nature is neither all black nor all white, yet is capable of 
supreme sacrifices when adequately appealed to. What we must get into 
our minds is the fact that a social order that insured a large measure of 
democracy in the early days of the Republic is inadequate to meet 
modern industrial conditions. Higher wages, material prosperity alone 
will not suffice to satisfy aspirations for a fuller self-realization, once 
the method by which these aspirations can be gained is glimpsed. For it 
cannot be too often repeated that the unquenchable conflicts are those 
waged for ideas and not dollars. These are tinged with religious 
emotion. 
 
IV 
Mr. Wilson's messages to the American people and to the world have 
proclaimed a new international order, a League of Democracies. And in 
a recent letter to New Jersey Democrats we find him warning his party, 
or more properly the nation, of the domestic social changes necessarily 
flowing from his international program. While rightly resolved to 
prosecute the war on the battle lines to the utmost limit of American
resources, he points out that the true significance of the conflict lies in 
"revolutionary change." "Economic and social forces," he says, "are 
being released upon the world, whose effect no political seer dare to 
conjecture." And we "must search our hearts through and through and 
make them ready for the birth of a new day--a day we hope and believe 
of greater opportunity and greater prosperity for the average mass of 
struggling men and women." He recognizes that the next great step in 
the development of democracy which the war must bring about--is the 
emancipation of labour; to use his own phrase, the redemption of 
masses of men and women from "economic serfdom." "The old party 
slogans," he declares, "will mean nothing to the future." 
Judging from this announcement, the President seems prepared to 
condemn boldly all the rotten timbers of the social structure that have 
outlived their usefulness--a position that hitherto no responsible 
politician has dared to take. Politicians, on the contrary, have revered 
the dead wood, have sought to shore the old timbers for their own 
purposes. But so far as any party is concerned, Mr. Wilson stands alone. 
Both of the two great parties, the Republican and the    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
