History, A Monthly Magazine, by 
New York Times 
 
Project Gutenberg's Current History, A Monthly Magazine, by New 
York Times This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost 
and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it 
away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License 
included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org 
Title: Current History, A Monthly Magazine The European War, March 
1915 
Author: New York Times 
Release Date: February 6, 2007 [EBook #20521] 
Language: English 
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK CURRENT 
HISTORY *** 
 
Produced by Juliet Sutherland, Linda Cantoni, and the Online 
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net 
 
The New York Times 
CURRENT HISTORY
A MONTHLY MAGAZINE 
THE EUROPEAN WAR 
MARCH, 1915 
 
Caldron of the Balkans 
But little has hitherto been published in English describing from 
original sources how the Balkan States, out of which the world conflict 
arose, resolved, in Kipling's phrase, to "stand up and meet the war." 
The following documents, taken from authoritative Balkan sources, 
show for the first time the purely Balkan aspect of the great struggle. 
 
How Turkey Went to War 
By Ottoman Authorities 
Immediately on receiving official notification of the rupture of 
diplomatic relations between Austria and Servia, the Turkish Grand 
Vizier hastened to inform the Diplomatic Corps in Constantinople that 
Turkey would remain neutral in the conflict. Explaining this official 
Turkish declaration, the following editorial article appeared early in 
August in the Ministerial paper, Tasfiri-Efkiar, published in 
Constantinople: 
The declarations made by the Grand Vizier to the Ambassadors of the 
powers, in order to reassure them as to the dispositions of Turkey, do 
not constitute from a legal point of view a declaration of neutrality, 
according to the stipulations of The Hague Conventions; likewise the 
Austrian ultimatum to Servia, viewed in the same light, is not 
tantamount to a declaration of war. In fact, The Hague Conventions 
demand a formal declaration in both cases. But if the formal declaration 
of Turkish neutrality cannot be made before she has received an official 
notification of the existing war, it is nevertheless true that the head of
the Government, in his conversations with the Ambassadors, has given 
them to understand what the opinion of the people is here. And even 
without this, the efforts of the Turkish Government, the desire, and the 
policy of Turkey, are so explicit that there is no ground for doubt as to 
the significance of the declarations of the Grand Vizier. 
Turkey has never asked for war, as she always has worked toward 
avoiding it. But we must not misunderstand the meaning of certain 
terms. Neutrality does not mean indifference. The present 
Austro-Servian conflict is to a supreme degree interesting to us. In the 
first place, one of our erstwhile opponents is fighting against a much 
stronger enemy. In the natural course of things Servia, which till lately 
was expressing, in a rather open way, her solidarity as a nation, still 
provoking us, and Greece will be materially weakened. In the second 
place, the results of this war may surpass the limits of a conflict 
between two countries, and in that case our interests will be just as 
materially affected. 
We must therefore keep our eyes open, as the circumstances are 
momentarily changing, and do not permit us to let escape certain 
advantages which we can secure by an active and rightly acting 
diplomacy. 
The policy of neutrality will impose on us the obligation of avoiding to 
side with either of the belligerents, but the same policy will force us to 
take all the necessary measures for safeguarding our interests and our 
frontiers. If it be true, as reported, that the pacificist tendencies of 
Turkey constitute one of the safest guarantees of peace in the Balkans, 
then we must hope that on the day when a general settlement of 
accounts will be made Europe will be willing to recognize the 
important part played by Turkey in the preservation of peace in the 
Near East, and will be eager to rectify, if not all, at least one part of the 
wrongs she has caused to our country. 
TURKEY LEARNS OF THE WAR. 
Turkish mobilization was still at its first stages when the European war 
began on Aug. 1, 1914. The Turkish Government in particular and the
Turkish population in general were overwhelmed by the unexpected 
turn of European events, and it was at the height of the crisis that 
Turkey received the news of her two battleships building in British 
yards being taken over by England. A correspondent of The Daily 
Atlantis of New York, writing in Constantinople on Aug. 10, said: 
The European war makes the Turks think that this is their golden 
opportunity for turkifying the empire from the one end    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
