Citation and Examination of 
William Shakspeare 
 
The Project Gutenberg EBook of Citation and Examination of William 
Shakspeare 
by Walter Savage Landor (#3 in our series by Walter Savage Landor) 
Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the 
copyright laws for your country before downloading or redistributing 
this or any other Project Gutenberg eBook. 
This header should be the first thing seen when viewing this Project 
Gutenberg file. Please do not remove it. Do not change or edit the 
header without written permission. 
Please read the "legal small print," and other information about the 
eBook and Project Gutenberg at the bottom of this file. Included is 
important information about your specific rights and restrictions in how 
the file may be used. You can also find out about how to make a 
donation to Project Gutenberg, and how to get involved. 
**Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts** 
**eBooks Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 
1971** 
*****These eBooks Were Prepared By Thousands of 
Volunteers!***** 
Title: Citation and Examination of William Shakspeare 
Author: Walter Savage Landor
Release Date: February, 2004 [EBook #5112] [Yes, we are more than 
one year ahead of schedule] [This file was first posted on April 30, 
2002] 
Edition: 10 
Language: English 
Character set encoding: ASCII 
*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK, CITATION 
ETC. OF W. SHAKSPEARE *** 
 
Transcribed from the 1891 Chatto & Windus edition by David Price, 
email 
[email protected] 
 
CITATION AND EXAMINATION OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE 
EUSEBY TREEN JOSEPH CARNABY AND SILAS GOUGH 
CLERK BEFORE THE WORSHIPFUL SIR THOMAS LUCY 
KNIGHT TOUCHING DEER-STEELING On the Nineteenth Day of 
September in the Year of Grace 1582 NOW FIRST PUBLISHED 
FROM ORIGINAL PAPERS 
 
EDITOR'S PREFACE. 
 
"It was an ancestor of my husband who BROUGHT OUT the famous 
Shakspeare." 
These words were really spoken, and were repeated in conversation as 
most ridiculous. Certainly such was very far from the lady's intention; 
and who knows to what extent they are true? 
The frolic of Shakspeare in deer-stealing was the cause of his Hegira; 
and his connection with players in London was the cause of his writing 
plays. Had he remained in his native town, his ambition had never been 
excited by the applause of the intellectual, the popular, and the 
powerful, which, after all, was hardly sufficient to excite it. He wrote 
from the same motive as he acted,--to earn his daily bread. He felt his
own powers; but he cared little for making them felt by others more 
than served his wants. 
The malignant may doubt, or pretend to doubt, the authenticity of the 
Examination here published. Let us, who are not malignant, be cautious 
of adding anything to the noisome mass of incredulity that surrounds us; 
let us avoid the crying sin of our age, in which the "Memoirs of a 
Parish Clerk," edited as they were by a pious and learned dignitary of 
the Established Church, are questioned in regard to their genuineness; 
and even the privileges of Parliament are inadequate to cover from the 
foulest imputation--the imputation of having exercised his inventive 
faculties--the elegant and accomplished editor of Eugene Aram's 
apprehension, trial, and defence. 
Indeed, there is little of real history, excepting in romances. Some of 
these are strictly true to nature; while histories in general give a 
distorted view of her, and rarely a faithful record either of momentous 
or of common events. 
Examinations taken from the mouth are surely the most trustworthy. 
Whoever doubts it may be convinced by Ephraim Barnett. 
The Editor is confident he can give no offence to any person who may 
happen to bear the name of Lucy. The family of Sir Thomas became 
extinct nearly half a century ago, and the estates descended to the Rev. 
Mr. John Hammond, of Jesus College, in Oxford, a respectable Welsh 
curate, between whom and him there existed at his birth eighteen prior 
claimants. He took the name of Lucy. 
The reader will form to himself, from this "Examination of 
Shakspeare," more favourable opinion of Sir Thomas than is left upon 
his mind by the dramatist in the character of Justice Shallow. The 
knight, indeed, is here exhibited in all his pride of birth and station, in 
all his pride of theologian and poet; he is led by the nose, while he 
believes that nobody can move him, and shows some other weaknesses, 
which the least attentive observer will discover; but he is not without a 
little kindness at the bottom of the heart,- -a heart too contracted to hold 
much, or to let what it holds ebulliate very freely. But, upon the whole, 
we neither can utterly hate nor utterly despise him. Ungainly as he is. - 
Circum praecordia ludit. 
The author of the "Imaginary Conversations" seems, in his "Boccacio 
and