and irresistible, this was the very man who could at 
any moment, by an inflection of his voice or by the syncope of a 
chuckle, move his audience at pleasure to tears or to laughter. He could 
haunt their memories for years afterwards with the infinite tenderness 
of his ejaculation as Hamlet, of "The fair Ophelia!" He could convulse 
them with merriment by his hesitating utterance as Falstaff of "A 
shirt--and a half!" Incidentally it is remarked by the biographer of 
Henderson that the qualifications requisite to constitute a reader of 
especial excellence seem to be these, "a good ear, a voice capable of 
inflexion, an understanding of, and taste for, the beauties of the author." 
Added to this, there must be, of course, a feeling, an ardour, an 
enthusiasm sufficient at all times to ensure their rapid and vivid 
manifestation. Richly endowed in this way, however, though 
Henderson was, his gifts were weighted, as we have seen were those 
also of Betterton, by a variety of physical defects, some of which were 
almost painfully conspicuous. Insomuch was this the case, in the latter 
instance, that Tony Aston has oddly observed, in regard to the all but 
peerless tragedian, "He was better to meet than to follow; for his aspect 
[the writer evidently means, here, when met] was serious, venerable, 
and majestic; in his latter time a little paralytic." Accepting at once as 
reasonable and as accurate what has thus been asserted by those who 
have made the art of elocution their especial and chosen study for 
analysis, it is surely impossible not to recognise at a glance how 
enormously a reader must, by necessity, be advantaged, who, in 
addition to the intellectual and emotional gifts already enumerated, 
possesses those personal attributes and physical endowments in which 
a reader, otherwise of surpassing excellence, like Henderson, and an 
actor, in other respects of incomparable ability, like Betterton, was each 
in turn so glaringly deficient. 
Whatever is here said in regard to Charles Dickens, it should be borne 
in mind, is written and published during the lifetime of his own 
immediate contemporaries. He himself, his readings, the sound of his 
voice, the ring of his footstep, the glance of his eye, are all still vividly
within the recollection of the majority of those who will examine the 
pages of this memorial. Everything, consequently, which is set forth in 
them is penned with a knowledge of its inevitable revision or 
endorsement by the reader's own personal remembrance. It is in the full 
glare of that public remembrance that the present writer refers to the 
great novelist as an impersonator of his more remarkable creations. 
Everybody who has seen him, who has heard him, who has carefully 
watched him, though it may be but at a single one of these memorable 
readings, will recognise at a glance the accuracy or the inaccuracy of 
the delineation. 
It is observable, in the first instance, in regard to Charles Dickens, that 
he had in an extraordinary degree the dramatic element in his character. 
It was an integral part of his individuality. It coloured his whole 
temperament or idiosyncracy. Unconsciously he described himself, to a 
T, in Nicholas Nickleby. "There's genteel comedy in your walk and 
manner, juvenile tragedy in your eye, and touch-and-go farce in your 
la'ugh," might have been applied to himself in his buoyant youth quite 
as readily and directly as to Nicholas. The author, rather than the hero 
of Nickleby, seems, in that happy utterance of the theatrical manager, 
to have been photographed. It cannot but now be apparent that, as an 
unpremeditated preliminary to Dickens's then undreamt-of career as a 
reader of his own works in public and professionally, the Private 
Theatricals over which he presided during several years in his own 
home circle as manager, prepared the way no less directly than his 
occasional Readings, later on, at some expense to himself (in travelling 
and otherwise) for purely charitable purposes. His proclivity 
stagewards, in effect, the natural trending of his line of life, so to speak, 
in the histrionic or theatrical direction, was, in another way, indicated at 
a yet earlier date, and not one jot less pointedly. It was so, we mean, at 
the very opening of his career in authorship, when having just sprung 
into precocious celebrity as the writer of the Sketches and of the earlier 
numbers of Pickwick, he contributed an opera and a couple of farces 
with brilliant success to the boards of the St. James's Theatre. Braham 
and Parry and Hullah winged with melody the words of "The Village 
Coquettes;" while the quaint humour of Harley excited roars of laughter 
through the whimsicalities of "Is She His Wife?" and "The Strange
Gentleman." Trifles light as air though these effusions might be, the 
radiant bubbles showed even then, as    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
