gods. As in all countries 
where the gods were individualised, the men of Celtic lands, whether 
aborigines or invaders, had toiled along the steep ascent from the 
primitive vague sense of being haunted to a belief in gods who, like 
Esus, Teutates, Grannos, Bormanus, Litavis, had names of a definite 
character. 
Among the prohibitions which had established themselves among the 
races of Celtic lands, as elsewhere, was that directed against the 
shedding of the blood of one's own kin. There are indications, too, that 
some at any rate of the tribes inhabiting these countries reckoned 
kinship through the mother, as in fact continued to be the case among 
the Picts of Scotland into historic times. It does not follow, as we know 
from other countries, that the pre-Aryan tribes of Gaul and Britain, or 
indeed the Aryan tribes themselves in their earliest stage, regarded their 
original ancestors as human. Certain names of deities such as Tarvos 
(the bull), Moccos (the pig), Epona (the goddess of horses), Damona 
(the goddess of cattle), Mullo (the ass), as well as the fact that the 
ancient Britons, according to Caesar, preserved the hen, the goose, and 
the hare, but did not kill and eat them, all point to the fact that in these 
countries as elsewhere certain animals were held in supreme respect 
and were carefully guarded from harm. Judging from the analogy of
kindred phenomena in other countries, the practice of respecting certain 
animals was often associated with the belief that all the members of 
certain clans were descended from one or other of them, but how far 
this system was elaborated in the Celtic world it is hard to say. This 
phenomenon, which is widely known as totemism, appears to be 
suggested by the prominence given to the wild boar on Celtic coins and 
ensigns, and by the place assigned on some inscriptions and bas-reliefs 
to the figure of a horned snake as well as by the effigies of other 
animals that have been discovered. It is not easy to explain the 
beginnings of totemism in Gaul or elsewhere, but it should always be 
borne in mind that early man could not regard it as an axiomatic truth 
that he was the superior of every other animal. To reach that proud 
consciousness is a very high step in the development of the human 
perspective, and it is to the credit of the Celts that, when we know them 
in historic times, they appear to have attained to this height, inasmuch 
as the human form is given to their deities. It is not always remembered 
how great a step in religious evolution is implied when the gods are 
clothed with human attributes. M. Salomon Reinach, in his account of 
the vestiges of totemism among the Celts, suggests that totemism was 
merely the hypertrophy of early man's social sense, which extended 
from man to the animals around him. This may possibly be the case, 
but it is not improbable that man also thought to discover in certain 
animals much-needed allies against some of the visible and invisible 
enemies that beset him. In his conflict with the malign powers around 
him, he might well have regarded certain animals as being in some 
respects stronger combatants against those powers than himself; and 
where they were not physically stronger, some of them, like the snake, 
had a cunning and a subtlety that seemed far to surpass his own. In 
course of time certain bodies of men came to regard themselves as 
being in special alliance with some one animal, and as being descended 
from that animal as their common ancestor. The existence side by side 
of various tribes, each with its definite totem, has not yet been fully 
proved for the Gaulish system, and may well have been a developed 
social arrangement that was not an essential part of such a mode of 
thought in its primary forms. The place of animal-worship in the Celtic 
religion will be more fully considered in a later chapter. Here it is only 
indicated as a necessary stage in relation to man's civilisation in the
hunting and the pastoral stages, which had to be passed through before 
the historic deities of Gaul and Britain in Roman times could have 
come into being. Certain of the divine names of the historic period, like 
Artio (the bear-goddess), Moccus (the pig), Epona (the mare), and 
Damona (the sheep), bear the unmistakable impress of having been at 
one time those of animals. 
As for the stage of civilisation at which totemism originated, there is 
much difference of opinion. The stage of mind which it implies would 
suggest that it reflects a time when man's mind was preoccupied with 
wild beasts, and when the alliances and friendships, which he would 
value in life, might be found in that    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.