Atlantic Monthly, The 
 
The Project Gutenberg eBook, Atlantic Monthly, Volume 3, No. 20, 
June, 
1859, by Various 
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with 
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or 
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included 
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net 
 
Title: Atlantic Monthly, Volume 3, No. 20, June, 1859 
Author: Various 
Release Date: March 28, 2004 [eBook #11751] [Date last updated: 
August 27, 2005] 
Language: English 
Character set encoding: US-ASCII 
***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ATLANTIC 
MONTHLY, VOLUME 3, NO. 20, JUNE, 1859*** 
E-text prepared by Joshua Hutchinson, Tonya Allen, and Project 
Gutenberg Distributed Proofreaders 
 
THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY.
A MAGAZINE OF LITERATURE, ART, AND POLITICS. 
VOL. III.--JUNE, 1859.--NO. XX. 
 
SHAKSPEARE'S ART. 
"Yet must I not give Nature all; thy Art, My gentle SHAKSPEARE, 
must enjoy a part. For though the poet's matter Nature be, His Art doth 
give the fashion."--Ben Jonson. 
Whoever would learn to think naturally, clearly, logically, and to 
express himself intelligibly and earnestly, let him give his days and 
nights to WILLIAM SHAKSPEARE. His ear will thus accustom itself 
to forms of phrase whose only mannerism is occasioned by the fulness 
of thought and the directness of expression; and he will not easily, 
through the habits which either his understanding or his ear will acquire, 
fall into the fluent cadences of that sort of writing in which words are 
used without discrimination of their nice meanings,--where the 
sentences are only a smoothly-undulating current of common phrases, 
in which it takes a page to say weakly what should be said forcibly in a 
few periods. 
These are somewhat novel arguments for the study of one whom all the 
world has so long reverenced as "the great poet of Nature." But they 
may properly serve to introduce a consideration of the sense in which 
that phrase should be understood,--an attempt, in short, to look into 
Shakspeare's modes of creation, and define his relations, as an artist, 
with Nature. 
We shall perhaps be excused the suggestion, that a poet cannot be 
natural in the same sense that a fool may be; he cannot be a 
natural,--since, if he is, he is not a poet. For to be a poet implies the 
ability to use ideas and forms of speech artistically, as well as to have 
an eye in a fine frenzy rolling. This is a distinction which all who write 
on poets or poetry should forever seek to keep clear by new 
illustrations. The poet has poetic powers that are born with him; but he
must also have a power over language, skill in arrangement, a thousand, 
yes, a myriad, of powers which he was born with only the ability to 
acquire, and to use after their acquirement. In ranking Shakspeare the 
great poet of Nature, it is meant that he had the purpose and the power 
to think what was natural, and to select and follow it,--that, among his 
thick-coming fancies, he could perceive what was too fine, what tinged 
with personal vanity, what incongruous, unsuitable, feeble, strained, in 
short, unnatural, and reject it. His vision was so strong that he saw his 
characters and identified himself with them, yet preserving his cool 
judgment above them, and subjecting all he felt through them to its test, 
and developing it through this artificial process of writing. This vision 
and high state of being he could assume and keep up and work out 
through days and weeks, foreseeing the end from the beginning, 
retaining himself, and determining long before how many acts his work 
should be, what should be its plot, what the order of its scenes, what 
personages he would introduce, and where the main passions of the 
work should be developed. His fancy, which enabled him to see the 
stage and all its characters,--almost to be them,--was so under the 
control of his imagination, that it did not, through any interruptions 
while he was at his labor, beguile him with caprices. The gradation or 
action of his work, opens and grows under his creative hand; twenty or 
more characters appear, (in some plays nearly forty, as in "Antony and 
Cleopatra" and the "First Part of Henry the Sixth,") who are all 
distinguished, who are all more or less necessary to the plot or the 
underplots, and who preserve throughout an identity that is life itself; 
all this is done, and the imagined state, the great power by which this 
evolution of characters and scene and story be carried on, is always 
under the control of the poet's will, and the direction of his taste or 
critical judgment. He chooses to set his imagination upon a piece of 
work, he selects his plot, conceives the action,    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
