superintend the decorations of Blenheim. But death intervened. The 
over-rated, overpaid, and most meretricious painter died at Hampton 
Court in 1707. There is evident error in Dominici's statement that the 
old man met his death from drowning on a visit to Languedoc. Walpole, 
summing up his merits and demerits, says, rather curiously, 'He was an
excellent painter for the sort of subjects on which he was employed, 
without much invention and with less taste!' 
The father of LOUIS LAGUERRE was by birth a Catalan, and held the 
appointment of Keeper of the Royal Menagerie at Versailles. To his 
son, born at Paris in 1663, Louis XIV. stood godfather, bestowing on 
the child his distinguished Christian name. The young Laguerre 
received his education at a Jesuit College, with the view of entering the 
priesthood, but a confirmed impediment in his speech demonstrated his 
unfitness for such a calling. He began to evince considerable art-ability, 
and, on the recommendation of the fathers of the college, he eventually 
embraced the profession of painting. He then entered the Royal 
Academy of France, and studied for a short time under Charles Le Brun. 
In 1683 he came to England with one Picard, a painter of architecture. 
At this time Verrio was in the acme of his prosperity. He was 
producing allegorical ceilings and staircases by wholesale. He had a 
troop of workmen under him, obedient to his instructions, dabbing in 
superficial yards of pink flesh, and furlongs of blue clouds. Verrio was 
happy to secure forthwith so efficient an assistant as Laguerre, and 
soon found him plenty to do. In nearly every work of Verrio's after this 
date, it is probable that Laguerre had a hand. He seems to have been an 
amiable, kindly, simple-minded man, without much self-assertion or 
any strong opinions of his own. He was quite content to do as Verrio 
bid him, even imitating him and following him through his figurative 
mysteries, and floundering with him in the mire of graceless drawing 
and gaudy colour and ridiculous fable. He had at least as much talent as 
his master--probably even more. But he never sought to outshine or 
displace him. 
'A modest, unintriguing man,' as Vertue calls him, he was quite 
satisfied with being second in command, no matter how ignorant and 
inefficient might be his captain. 
John Tijon, his father-in-law, a founder of iron balustrades, said of him, 
'God has made him a painter, and there left him.' 
He worked under Verrio in St. Bartholomew's Hospital, and at Burleigh; 
he executed staircases at old Devonshire House, in Piccadilly, at
Buckingham House, and at Petworth; assisted in the paintings at 
Marlborough House, St. James's Park; decorated the saloon at 
Blenheim; and in many of the apartments at Burleigh on the Hill 'the 
walls are covered with his Cæsars.' 
William of Orange gave the painter lodgings at Hampton Court, where 
it seems he painted the Labours of Hercules in chiaro-oscuro, and 
repaired Andrea Mantegna's pictures of the Triumphs of Julius Cæsar. 
The commissioners for rebuilding St. Paul's Cathedral unanimously 
chose Laguerre to decorate the cupola with frescoes. Subsequently this 
decision was abandoned in favour of Thornhill; but, as Walpole says, 
'the preference was not ravished from Laguerre by superior merit.' 
Sir James Thornhill received payment for his paintings in the dome of 
St. Paul's at the rate of forty shillings the square yard. The world has 
still the opportunity of deciding upon the merits or demerits of those 
works. Vertue thinks that Sir James was indebted to Laguerre for his 
knowledge of historical painting on ceilings, etc. For decorating the 
staircase of the South Sea Company's House, Sir James received only 
twenty-five shillings per square yard. By speculating in the shares of 
the same Company, it may be stated that another artist, Sir Godfrey 
Kneller, lost £20,000. But prosperous Sir Godfrey could afford to lose; 
his fortune could sustain even such a shock as that; at his death he left 
an estate of £2000 per annum. He had intended that Thornhill should 
decorate the staircase of his seat at Wilton, but learning that Newton 
was sitting to Sir James, he grew angry. 'No portrait painter shall paint 
my house,' cried Sir Godfrey, and he gave the commission to Laguerre, 
who did his very best for his brother artist. 
On the union of England and Scotland, Laguerre received an order 
from Queen Anne to design a set of tapestries commemorative of the 
event, introducing portraits of her Majesty and her Ministers. He 
executed the requisite drawings; but it does not appear that the work 
was ever carried out. 
In 1711 he was a director of an academy of drawing instituted in 
London, under the presidency of Kneller. On the resignation of Kneller,
there was a probability of Laguerre being elected in his place; but he 
was again    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.