Apologia pro Vita Sua | Page 5

and 8). He "felt some regret for having
disturbed me."
But I pass on from these multiform imputations, and confine myself to
this one consideration, viz. that he has made any fresh imputation upon
me at all. He gave up the charge of knavery; well and good: but where
was the logical necessity of his bringing another? I am sitting at home
without a thought of Mr. Kingsley; he wantonly breaks in upon me
with the charge that I had "informed" the world "that Truth for its own
sake need not and on the whole ought not to be a virtue with the Roman
clergy." When challenged on the point he cannot bring a fragment of
evidence in proof of his assertion, and he is convicted of false witness
by the voice of the world. Well, I should have thought that he had now
nothing whatever more to do. "Vain man!" he seems to make answer,
"what simplicity in you to think so! If you have not broken one
commandment, let us see whether we cannot convict you of the breach
of another. If you are not a swindler or forger, you are guilty of arson or
burglary. By hook or by crook you shall not escape. Are you to suffer
or I? What does it matter to you who are going off the stage, to receive
a slight additional daub upon a character so deeply stained already? But
think of me, the immaculate lover of Truth, so observant (as I have told
you p. 8) of 'hault courage and strict honour,'--and (aside)--'and not as
this publican'--do you think I can let you go scot free instead of myself?
No; noblesse oblige. Go to the shades, old man, and boast that Achilles
sent you thither."
But I have not even yet done with Mr. Kingsley's method of disputation.
Observe secondly:--when a man is said to be a knave or a fool, it is
commonly meant that he is either the one or the other; and that,--either
in the sense that the hypothesis of his being a fool is too absurd to be
entertained; or, again, as a sort of contemptuous acquittal of one, who
after all has not wit enough to be wicked. But this is not at all what Mr.
Kingsley proposes to himself in the antithesis which he suggests to his
readers. Though he speaks of me as an utter dotard and fanatic, yet all

along, from the beginning of his pamphlet to the end, he insinuates, he
proves from my writings, and at length in his last pages he openly
pronounces, that after all he was right at first, in thinking me a
conscious liar and deceiver.
Now I wish to dwell on this point. It cannot be doubted, I say, that, in
spite of his professing to consider me as a dotard and driveller, on the
ground of his having given up the notion of my being a knave, yet it is
the very staple of his pamphlet that a knave after all I must be. By
insinuation, or by implication, or by question, or by irony, or by sneer,
or by parable, he enforces again and again a conclusion which he does
not categorically enunciate.
For instance (1) P. 14. "I know that men used to suspect Dr. Newman, I
have been inclined to do so myself, of writing a whole sermon ... for
the sake of one single passing hint, one phrase, one epithet, one little
barbed arrow which ... he delivered unheeded, as with his finger tip, to
the very heart of an initiated hearer, never to be withdrawn again."
(2) P. 15. "How was I to know that the preacher, who had the
reputation of being the most acute man of his generation, and of having
a specially intimate acquaintance with the weaknesses of the human
heart, was utterly blind to the broad meaning and the plain practical
result of a sermon like this, delivered before fanatic and hot-headed
young men, who hung upon his every word? That he did not foresee
that they would think that they obeyed him, by becoming affected,
artificial, sly, shifty, ready for concealments and equivocations?"
(3) P. 17. "No one would have suspected him to be a dishonest man, if
he had not perversely chosen to assume a style which (as he himself
confesses) the world always associates with dishonesty."
(4) Pp. 29, 30. "If he will indulge in subtle paradoxes, in rhetorical
exaggerations; if, whenever he touches on the question of truth and
honesty, he will take a perverse pleasure in saying something shocking
to plain English notions, he must take the consequences of his own
eccentricities."

(5) P. 34. "At which most of my readers will be inclined to cry: 'Let Dr.
Newman alone, after that....