mistake 40 A query proposed, by Mr. 
Molyneux in his DIOPTRICS, considered 41 One born blind would not 
at first have any IDEA of distance by sight 42 This not agreeable to the 
common principles 43 The proper objects of sight, not without the 
mind, nor the images of any thing without the mind 44 This more fully 
explained 45 In what sense we must be understood to see distance and 
external things 46 Distance, and things placed at a distance, not 
otherwise perceived by the eye than by the ear 47 The IDEAS of sight 
more apt to be confounded with the IDEAS of touch than those of 
hearing are 48 How this comes to pass 49 Strictly speaking, we never 
see and feel the same thing 50 Objects of SIGHT twofold, mediate and
immediate 51 These hard to separate in our thoughts 52 The received 
accounts of our perceiving magnitude by sight, false 53 Magnitude 
perceived as immediately as distance 54 Two kinds of sensible 
extension, neither of which is infinitely divisible 55 The tangible 
magnitude of an OBJECT steady, the visible not 56 By what means 
tangible magnitude is perceived by sight 57 This further enlarged on 58 
No necessary connection between confusion or faintness of appearance, 
and small or great magnitude 59 The tangible magnitude of an 
OBJECT more heeded than the visible, and why 60 An instance of this 
61 Men do not measure by visible feet or inches 62 No necessary 
connection between visible and tangible extension 63 Greater visible 
magnitude might signify lesser tangible magnitude 64 The judgments 
we make of magnitude depend altogether on experience 65 Distance 
and magnitude seen as shame or anger 66 But we are prone to think 
otherwise, and why 67 The moon seems greater in the horizon than in 
the meridian 68 The cause of this phenomenon assigned 69 The 
horizontal moon, why greater at one time than another. 70 The account 
we have given proved to be true 71 And confirmed by the moon's 
appearing greater in a mist 72 Objection answered 73 The way wherein 
faintness suggests greater magnitude illustrated 74 Appearance of the 
horizontal moon, why thought difficult to explain 75 Attempts towards 
the solution of it made by several, but in vain 76 The opinion of Dr. 
Wallis 77 It is shown to be unsatisfactory 78 How lines and angles may 
be of use in computing apparent magnitudes 79 One born blind, being 
made to see, what judgment he would make of magnitude 80 The 
MINIMUM VISIBLE the same to all creatures 81 Objection answered 
82 The eye at all times perceives the same number of visible points 83 
Two imperfections in the VISIVE FACULTY 84 Answering to which, 
we may conceive two perfections 85 In neither of these two ways do 
microscopes improve the sight 86 The case of microscopical eyes, 
considered 87 The sight, admirably adapted to the ends of seeing 88 
Difficulty concerning erect vision 89 The common way of explaining it 
90 The same shown to be false 91 Not distinguishing between IDEAS 
of sight and touch, cause of mistake in this matter 92 The case of one 
born blind, proper to be considered 93 Such a one might by touch attain 
to have IDEAS of UPPER and LOWER 94 Which modes of situation 
he would attribute only to things tangible 95 He would not at first sight
think anything he saw, high or low, erect or inverted 96 This illustrated 
by an example 97 By what means he would come to denominate visible 
OBJECTS, high or low, etc. 98 Why he should think those OBJECTS 
highest, which are painted on the lowest part of his eye, and VICE 
VERSA 99 How he would perceive by sight, the situation of external 
objects 100 Our propension to think the contrary, no argument against 
what has been said 101 Objection 102 Answer 103 An object could not 
be known at first sight by the colour 104 Nor by the magnitude thereof 
105 Nor by the figure 106 In the first act of vision, no tangible thing 
would be suggested by sight 107 Difficulty proposed concerning 
number 108 Number of things visible, would not at first sight suggest 
the like number of things tangible 109 Number the creature of the mind 
110 One born blind would not at first sight number visible things as 
others do 111 The situation of any object determined with respect only 
to objects of the same sense 112 No distance, great or small, between a 
visible and tangible thing 113 The not observing this, cause of 
difficulty in erect vision 114 Which otherwise includes nothing 
unaccountable 115 What is meant by the picture being inverted 116 
Cause of mistake in this matter 117 Images in the eye, not pictures    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
