A Statement: On the Future of This Church

A Statement: On the Future of
This Church, by

John Haynes Holmes This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at
no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it,
give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg
License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
Title: A Statement: On the Future of This Church
Author: John Haynes Holmes
Release Date: March 6, 2006 [EBook #17939]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ASCII
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FUTURE
OF THIS CHURCH ***

Produced by Edmund Dejowski

Transcriber's Note: Page numbers are indicated thus [3] at the end of
each printed page.

The Messiah Pulpit

A STATEMENT:
the Future of This Church
By
John Haynes Holmes
Minister of the Church of the Messiah
Series 1918-1919----No. VI
PRICE, FIVE CENTS
Published by the
Church of the Messiah
Park Avenue and 34th Street
New York City
[1]
NOTICE
The Messiah Pulpit, by tradition and practice, is a free platform,
dedicated to the ideal of truth. Its sermons, in both their spoken and
written form, are the utterances of the preacher, who accepts for them
exclusive responsibility.
The publication of these sermons is made possible by a private fund for
this purpose. Contributions to this fund are needed, and may be sent to
Rev. John Haynes Holmes, 61 East 34th Street, New York City.
[2]
A STATEMENT:

On the Future of This Church
On Sunday, November 24 last, as most of you know. I was invited by
unanimous vote of the people of All Souls Church, Chicago, "to take up
the work laid down by (their) beloved pastor," the late Dr. Jenkin Lloyd
Jones. On Thursday, November 28, I received this call through the
personal visitation of two members of the Chicago church, and agreed
to give it most earnest consideration. On Sunday, December 1, through
my associate, Mr. Brown, I announced this call to the congregation of
the Church of the Messiah, explaining that it involved the ministry of
All Souls Church, the directorship of Abraham Lincoln Centre, and the
editorship of the weekly liberal religious journal, called "Unity." I
stated in my announcement that I had asked and been granted ample
time for the consideration of this call, but that I intended to answer it as
speedily as possible. On Thursday last, just five weeks to a day after
receiving the invitation to Chicago, I sent my reply for transmission to
the people of All Souls Church this morning. I choose this same time to
announce to you my decision.
At the beginning of my consideration of the problem, I found questions
of personal inclination and comfort inevitably to the fore. For twelve
years minus one month, I have lived and labored in New York City.
Every particle of moral energy which I possess, I have invested here.
Nearly all of my friends are associated with this community. Especially
am I bound by ties of deepest reverence and affection to this church.
Here are memories of joy and sorrow and great trial which are more
truly a part of me than the voice with which I speak, or the hand with
which I turn these pages. It [3] needed but this single summons to teach
me what I had not known--how deeply my roots are struck into the soil
of this place, and how great the pain and hazard of their exposure,
removal and replanting.
It very soon became clear to me, however, that personal considerations
could rightly have but little part in the settlement of this problem. In no
spirit of bravado, but in simplest recognition of the truth, I say to you
that I believe I would have been betraying the profession which I have
sworn to serve had I permitted conditions of personal affection,

however lovely and precious, to determine my decision in this case. I
take seriously the fact of my ordination--that as a minister of religion I
have been "set apart," as the traditional phrase has it, to the high
purpose of propagating an idea, championing a cause, seeking the best
and the highest that I know in terms of God and of his holy will. I am
here, in other words, not to make or to keep friends, not to enjoy
pleasant associations of hand and heart, not even to serve a particular
church, but to serve, perhaps at the cost of these other and more
personal things, the great idea of which I speak. To allow my individual
sentiments to fix the place and fashion of my professional service,
would be to me as dastardly a thing as to allow considerations of profit
or prestige to make decision. Not even my wife or my children could
interfere in this case. My problem