cliff edge only to find that the possession of wings was 
not enough to assure flight to a human being. The sea that to this day 
bears his name witnesses that he made the attempt and perished by it. 
In this is assumed the bald story, from which might grow the legend of 
a wise king who ruled a peaceful people--'judged, sitting in the sun,' as 
Browning has it, and fashioned for himself wings with which he flew 
over the sea and where he would, until the prince, Icarus, desired to 
emulate him. Icarus, fastening the wings to his shoulders with wax, was 
so imprudent as to fly too near the sun, when the wax melted and he 
fell, to lie mourned of water-nymphs on the shores of waters 
thenceforth Icarian. Between what we have assumed to be the base of 
fact, and the legend which has been invested with such poetic grace in
Greek story, there is no more than a century or so of re-telling might 
give to any event among a people so simple and yet so given to 
imagery. 
We may set aside as pure fable the stories of the winged horse of 
Perseus, and the flights of Hermes as messenger of the gods. With them 
may be placed the story of Empedocles, who failed to take Etna 
seriously enough, and found himself caught by an eruption while 
within the crater, so that, flying to safety in some hurry, he left behind 
but one sandal to attest that he had sought refuge in space--in all 
probability, if he escaped at all, he flew, but not in the sense that the 
aeronaut understands it. But, bearing in mind the many men who tried 
to fly in historic times, the legend of Icarus and Daedalus, in spite of 
the impossible form in which it is presented, may rank with the story of 
the Saracen of Constantinople, or with that of Simon the Magician. A 
simple folk would naturally idealise the man and magnify his exploit, 
as they magnified the deeds of some strong man to make the legends of 
Hercules, and there, full-grown from a mere legend, is the first record 
of a pioneer of flying. Such a theory is not nearly so fantastic as that 
which makes the Capnobates, on the strength of their name, the 
inventors of hot-air balloons. However it may be, both in story and in 
picture, Icarus and his less conspicuous father have inspired the 
Caucasian mind, and the world is the richer for them. 
Of the unsupported myths--unsupported, that is, by even a shadow of 
probability--there is no end. Although Latin legend approaches nearer 
to fact than the Greek in some cases, in others it shows a disregard for 
possibilities which renders it of far less account. Thus Diodorus of 
Sicily relates that one Abaris travelled round the world on an arrow of 
gold, and Cassiodorus and Glycas and their like told of mechanical 
birds that flew and sang and even laid eggs. More credible is the story 
of Aulus Gellius, who in his Attic Nights tells how Archytas, four 
centuries prior to the opening of the Christian era, made a wooden 
pigeon that actually flew by means of a mechanism of balancing 
weights and the breath of a mysterious spirit hidden within it. There 
may yet arise one credulous enough to state that the mysterious spirit 
was precursor of the internal combustion engine, but, however that may 
be, the pigeon of Archytas almost certainly existed, and perhaps it 
actually glided or flew for short distances--or else Aulus Gellius was an
utter liar, like Cassiodorus and his fellows. In far later times a certain 
John Muller, better known as Regiomontanus, is stated to have made an 
artificial eagle which accompanied Charles V. on his entry to and exit 
from Nuremberg, flying above the royal procession. But, since Muller 
died in 1436 and Charles was born in 1500, Muller may be ruled out 
from among the pioneers of mechanical flight, and it may be concluded 
that the historian of this event got slightly mixed in his dates. 
Thus far, we have but indicated how one may draw from the richest 
stores from which the Aryan mind draws inspiration, the Greek and 
Latin mythologies and poetic adaptations of history. The existing 
legends of flight, however, are not thus to be localised, for with two 
possible exceptions they belong to all the world and to every 
civilisation, however primitive. The two exceptions are the Aztec and 
the Chinese; regarding the first of these, the Spanish conquistadores 
destroyed such civilisation as existed in Tenochtitlan so thoroughly that, 
if legend of flight was among the Aztec records, it went with the rest; 
as to the Chinese, it is more than passing strange that they, who claim 
to have known    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
